This opinion piece critically examines Eskom's electricity pricing practices, specifically its discounted power deals with the ferrochrome sector in South Africa. The title and excerpt clearly articulate the central argument: that these substantial discounts offered to large smelters have led them to postpone investments in clean energy. This delay, in turn, shifts the financial burden of these concessions onto the general public. The article likely provides an analysis of how this burden is manifested, perhaps through increased electricity tariffs for consumers or through the broader economic ramifications of a slower transition to renewable energy. The piece is expected to advocate for a reevaluation of Eskom's pricing strategies, emphasizing the need for a more equitable distribution of energy costs and a stronger commitment to environmental sustainability. It critiques the current system where large industrial players benefit at the expense of the public and the environment, calling for greater transparency and accountability in Eskom's dealings. The article aims to raise public awareness about this issue and potentially influence policy decisions regarding energy pricing and investment in green technologies.