An Iranian official has publicly stated that Pakistan is not considered a suitable intermediary for facilitating talks between Iran and the United States. Ebrahim Rezaei, identified as an Iranian official, articulated this position, citing specific instances that have led to this assessment. The core of his argument appears to stem from a perceived lack of reliability and commitment from the US side when engaging through Pakistan as an intermediary. Rezaei pointed to what he described as the US backtracking on an initiative that was proposed by Pakistan, suggesting that American promises or agreements made through this channel were not honored. This instance, along with unfulfilled commitments related to Lebanon, has apparently eroded Iran's confidence in Pakistan's effectiveness as a go-between.

The implication of Rezaei's statement is that Iran has lost faith in the process of indirect diplomacy mediated by Pakistan. This could be due to a belief that the US is not genuinely committed to de-escalation or finding common ground, or that the mediation process itself is flawed. The phrase 'No word against Americans' wishes' is particularly telling, suggesting a potential Iranian perception that the US dictates terms or has specific demands that are not being adequately addressed or respected in the ongoing diplomatic landscape, even when channeled through a third party. This sentiment may also indicate an Iranian frustration with the pace and nature of US engagement, possibly feeling that the US is not acting in good faith or is not serious about reaching a resolution.

This development has significant implications for regional diplomacy and the broader efforts to manage tensions between Iran and the US. If Pakistan is no longer seen as a viable conduit, alternative channels for communication will need to be explored, or the direct dialogue (if any exists) will become even more critical. The specific mention of Lebanon suggests that the issues at hand are complex and may involve broader regional dynamics, where US actions or inactions have tangible consequences. The Iranian official's candid remarks highlight the delicate nature of international relations and the challenges inherent in mediating disputes between nations with deeply entrenched differences.