Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs has weighed in on the practice of utilizing VIP lounges at airports, stating that it is 'just the way it is'. This statement comes amidst a broader discussion, though Rinkēvičs chose not to directly address the specific case of Prime Minister Evika Siliņa. He suggested that the Prime Minister herself should comment on any controversies surrounding her personal use of such facilities.

However, the President did offer some general justifications for the existence and use of these exclusive airport areas. These lounges, often characterized by their comfortable seating, premium services, and privacy, are typically reserved for high-profile individuals, including government officials, business leaders, and celebrities. The rationale often cited for their existence is the need for security, efficiency, and a conducive environment for work or rest during travel. For busy officials, the ability to conduct meetings or catch up on work in a secure and private setting can be crucial, especially when navigating the often chaotic environment of a public airport.

The President's remarks imply an acceptance of the status quo, suggesting that the use of VIP lounges by those in positions of power is a long-standing and established practice within the international travel system. While he did not explicitly defend Siliņa's actions, his broader comments can be interpreted as an acknowledgment that such amenities are part of the expected perks and conveniences associated with high-level travel. This perspective, however, may not sit well with the general public, who might view the use of such exclusive facilities by elected officials as a sign of elitism or a disconnect from the everyday experiences of ordinary citizens.

The debate surrounding the use of VIP lounges often touches upon issues of transparency, accountability, and fairness. Critics argue that such privileges can create a perception of inequality and may not always be justified by genuine security or work-related needs. In many cases, the public's attention is drawn to such issues when they are perceived as excessive or when they occur during times of economic hardship for the general population. The President's attempt to provide justifications, while perhaps aimed at de-escalating the situation, may also serve to further fuel the public's scrutiny of official travel practices. The core of the issue often lies in finding a balance between the practical needs of public service and the public's expectation of equal treatment and transparency.